Special “Do Me a Personal Favor” Issue
Dear Other Than Me,
It’s interesting to me that I get so much passionate resistance when I suggest that everything is nature, that what humans do isn’t somehow separate or special. Take the Gulf oil spill, please. It is obvious to me, but apparently no one else, that the spill and all its consequences are nothing more than nature taking its course. One of Earth’s species behaves in a certain way and certain effects obtain. The event isn’t an affront against nature, it simply is nature. It isn’t humans defiling and destroying nature any more than when a beaver builds a dam. Other living things are affected by the dam. And if it breaks, that has consequences for other living things as well. But no one accuses beavers of defiling nature.
It just happens that one of nature’s species has developed the ability to create bigger messes than any other. Placing humans up on a pedestal, not merely apart from nature, but above it, is just pure, stupid hubris. What new.
Now, about that personal favor. “I’ve got this thing and it’s (expletive) golden. And I’m just not giving it up for (expletive) nothing.” You receive this invaluable quarterly publication at no cost to you, (other than the cost to your humanity). Now it’s time for a little quid pro Blago. So I’m sending out my first semi-annual (wait, is that twice a year or every two years?) B I G F E E L E R.
Like many of you, I’m looking for a way to publish something/anything that is easy and cheap. One of you must know a good agent or have an in at some publisher or be aware of a really effortless, free self-publishing strategy. I’ve got a book’s worth of these meletters, and another book’s worth of columns, essays, blog posts, etc., mostly having something to do with advertising. And, of course, a whole ‘nother book’s worth of Chairman Jimmy-isms. My urge to bookify these collections surges unabated. However, unlike my brother, who gets published through rigor, being smart and persevering, I’m looking for the path less difficult.
Notes from the Montana road trip
Why do TVs in ALL motel rooms sit too low, making it impossible to watch TV while in bed because one’s feet or knees (or some other appendage) obscure the view?
The mall in Billings, Montana features, impressively, more than 100 stores. Unfortunately, 83 of them are casinos.
When driving across the country, it’s not uncommon to pass a herd of cows off in the distance. Or, occasionally, a few horses. But on this trip, for the first time I can recall, we saw, several times, cows and horses together, in close proximity, intermingling. WHATZ!? Is this a practice unique to North Dakota and Montana? Is there some law about this? If it’s okay for horses and cows to hang out together, why don’t they do so around here?
Several issues back, I explained the difference between an orchard and a grove. Just as those two words might mistakenly be used interchangeably, (though not by you since I clarified the distinction for you, right?), such is the case with two words that we bumped into on this trip: mesa and butte. So I asked my research department to look into this matter and get back to me.
Their finding: most sources equivocate regarding the distinction. While all sources allow that mesas are larger or more extensive than buttes, these same sources all describe them as being similar except in size. Why the reluctance to proclaim that they are, in fact, geologically identical phenomena aside from scale, rather than merely “similar”? What dirty little secret lies (or is it “lays”) behind this obvious obfuscation? (Care to weigh in on this, Teri?)
Which leads us to your homework assignment: Put your research staff to work on why there are two other crazy words synonymous with “equivocate”, namely, “prevaricate” and “tergiversate.” Why do we need more than one crazy word? Does the existence of this collection of words constitute, in and of itself, an obfuscation? Or worse, a tergiversation?
While the Sox appear to have been in the race until that last series with the Twins, this appearance was a mirage. In fact, the Sox season ended on August 17 in Minneapolis, when, after trailing the whole game, they tied it in the ninth and went ahead in the tenth, only to give up a walk-off two-run home run a half inning later. That game was the death knell for the 2010 Sox. The rest was merely
the twitching of a corpse.
My friend Jeff Getz handed me a t-shirt awhile back as we sat down to lunch. It was a vintage t-shirt from Das Foot, Sturm Communications’ running team, circa 1990. The distinctive Das Foot logo imprinted on the t-shirt was designed by my friend, Darch Clampitt. Das Foot only ran a few races, but that experience, I’m sure, lives on in the memories of many of us Foots. After a decade or more of runninglessness, I have gingerly resumed my running this summer, often wearing that already worn shirt, relishing the tie to 20 years ago. Sheesh, now I feel compelled to offset this momentary lapse into sentimentalism, so . . .
I was thinking the other day about the fact that, at this very moment, and at every moment, all across the world, millions upon millions of creatures of all sorts, including cute little baby mammals and birds, are being attacked, viciously mauled, and mercilessly slaughtered by millions of other creatures, who themselves, may be similarly slaughtered in the next moment.
As a result of this perpetual, wholesale massacre, millions of babies are orphaned, so that, even if they avoid being slaughtered or maimed themselves, they are destined to die a prolonged death by starvation. All part of the wonderful pageant of nature. That’s what I was thinking about the other day.
Here’s a sure fire strategy for inflating your own importance! Add “–ate” or “–ation” to every word that doesn’t already end that way. Just follow the lead of TV news people, like the one who recently reported someone “allegating” instead of the apparently inadequate word it supplants: “alleging.”
Consider, for 30 seconds, the futility of a joyless claim to joy; a dumbed down claim to intelligence; a complicated claim of simplicity; a boring expression of excitement. This is a pervasive, fundamental flaw in most advertisers’ advertising. They spend endless time and money determining what their brand’s personality is, then, rather than having that personality, they devote their advertising dollars to telling us that they have that personality. Once again, Chairman Jimmy said it best: “Don’t say it. Convey it.”
Another great thing about the brand of water I drink, (Diet Coke), is that it doesn’t attract bees or other sugar-addicted insects. Bees, being primitive creatures, haven’t yet evolved the sophisticated sensibilities necessary to appreciate sweetness sans sugar. I’m confident American scientists will figure out how to make a honeycomb out of aspartame or Splenda before even the smartest bee does.
Stoically,
Jim
Chairman Jimmy Says:
Love or get off the pot.
“ The ideal marketer is now half digital sophisticate, half anthropologist.” – Molly Flatt “Specificity compromises spontaneity.” – Franco (Not the Spanish dictator, but rather, the General Hospital character. Sorry, Darch.) “Every time we threaten an apocalypse and it doesn’t happen, we cheapen the issue.” – Pat Michaels (of the Cato Institute) “The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be kindled.” – Plutarch “I’ll have a glass of water . . . and the ham from her salad.” — Hugh Hart “Machete‘ don’t text.” — Machete‘ “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.” – Mark Twain
Harper’s Index® and Findings Digest
Average annual government expenditures since 2005 on military research and development: $77,000,000,000
Average expenditures on energy research and development: $5,000,000,000
Estimated number of cases pending in India’s court system: 30,000,000
Number of people in India who currently have access to a mobile phone: 617,500,000
Number who have access to a toilet: 366,000,000
Odds, given by an online bookmaker, that the Large Hadron Collider will confirm the existence of God: 100:1